It
has been a year since we last explored the real estate aspects of
self-storage in depth. The momentum of the last millennium
has carried the self-storage industry to new heights and new
directions. The question of course is what does the first
few years of the next millennium hold for the industry as it
relates to real estate values and liquidity.
As
I write this, and review my outline for the article, just one
month before the end of the year, I am struck by one word,
CHANGE. It is apparent that many of the constants we have
known (or thought we knew) in the past are now changing and that
these changes will have a dramatic impact on the value of our
investments. The major question that we must come to terms
with is: Are these changes simply the continuation of
the ever-present cycles of our previous experience or are these
changes systemic, thus rendering our past experience invalid to
judge the future?
Let's begin our
exploration by gathering some facts about the current market,
hoping to get some perspective for the future.
Over-Building
We
all know that one of the single largest issues that affects the
self-storage industry, both in regards to cash flow and
investment values, is the impact of potential over-building.
Unfortunately, the magnitude of the problem from an industry
standpoint is not well established. There are no reliable
national numbers available on new facilities being constructed
and those numbers that are reliable are usually developed for a
specific site. However, despite the fact that the magnitude
of the problem is difficult to quantify, it does not mean that
overbuilding does not exist. As owners look at their own
markets and submarkets, it is apparent that there is substantial
antidotal proof that over-building is becoming a serious
problem. Over-building, as we have explored before in these
pages, can have a material impact on rental rates, occupancies
and overall real estate values. (For two articles on
over-building, see www.self-storage.com.) Clearly,
we are in the phase of the market cycle where over-building is
occurring. The question is just how significant is it to
the individual owner and to the overall market, not is
overbuilding a reality.
Financing
Unfortunately,
we see some troubling signs for those that will need to refinance
in the intermediate term, say 24 to 36 months. First,
because of the lack of business lenders are seeing many of these
conduits are beginning to leave the business. While
a couple of really good lenders remain, it certainly means less
competition at borrowing time. We also hear that many local
banks are increasing their underwriting standards and are less
likely to consider the facility on its own merits, but rather
will place more reliance on the credit of the owner, i.e., net
worth apart from the project. Secondly, over-building will
reduce rental rates and occupancies on some, if not many
projects. This combined with higher interest rates will
cause a reduction in the amount a lender is willing to loan on a
project. I am aware of several individual situations
where refinancing cannot liquidate the existing first mortgage
because the combination of declining rental rates, and occupancy
along with increasing interest rates simply does not provide the
lender with sufficient coverage to make the same loan.
We believe that the prudent owner with an intermediate term financing decision should consider locking up available financing while there is competition in the market and money is available so your project can support loan to value ratios sufficient to refinance the existing debt.You can always refinance again if the rates go down.
Changes
in the Industry
As
we approach the millennium mark, we find that the last century
had more changes than the previous nine hundred years. On
January 1, 1900, how many people would have believed that there
would be more horseless carriages than horses; children
would spend 38 hours per week watching TV or on the computer; one
could fly from New York to San Francisco in four hours; that
only three percent of the population would work on farms (60%
then). Oh yes, no right minded person would have believed
people would pay $100 per month to rent a storage shed,
especially when you had a perfectly good barn.
The
point of all of this is, simply to say the rate of change is
increasing and will impact our embryonic industry as well as the
rest of the economy. This future change will create
opportunities as well as challenges. While we tend to think
of conventional over-building as our single most difficult issue,
the future may define obsolesce as our greatest challenge. Take
a moment to think about a couple of changes that are becoming
visible, if not currently important. Drop off storage is a
great example, the providers are still working the bugs out, but
if they find the right formula, the industry could change
dramatically. The Internet also provides many interesting,
if not yet fully exposed opportunities. For example, if
(granted a big if, but so was TV in 1945), the Internet really
does become the principle method of marketing self-storage, will
location still be the single greatest marketing tool?
Obviously,
the successful owners and operators will be those that will keep
ahead of these changes and react accordingly. Carefully
monitoring the value of your investment will be even more
important in the future.
In conclusion, it is very difficult
to see into the future very far, but we have attempted to peek
around the first corner of the new millennium. What we find
are some short term bumps most of which we have seen
before and will likely see again. However, we also see the
shadows of greater changes further into the next century (maybe
even just the first decade) and know that we must be alert and
responsive to the changes.